Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Diaz v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 4:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Felixander Diaz
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmonds et al v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company et al
as 5:2009cv01379
Plaintiff:
Jane F Edmonds, Vicki L Campbell and Vickie C Leyja
Defendant:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bates v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 6:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
William E. Bates, William E. Bates and William E. Bates
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cameron v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Bruce C Cameron
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Dobson Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Mobile Systems Integrators, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Defendant:
Mobile Systems Integrators, LLC and Shelmore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parks v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00212
Plaintiff:
Billie Parks
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Radio Shack Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Laffoon v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sam Laffoon
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amyx et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2008cv01123
Plaintiff:
Joan Amyx, Andromeda Augustino, Abigail Barwick and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Cingular Wireless LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
