Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 24-1039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FINESSE WIRELESS LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC and NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Defendant:
ERICSSON, INC.
In re: Waverly Licensing LLC
as 23-109
Petitioner:
In re: WAVERLY LICENSING LLC, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE and others
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC and GRANITE RIVER LABS INC.
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 21-2376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE A. SALAZAR
Defendant / Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Defendant:
HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 21-2320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE A. SALAZAR
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
In re: Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
as 21-112
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, dba Verizon Wireless and others
Petitioner:
In re: VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
RAYMOND A. MERCADO, Ph.D.
Advanced Media Networks, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 19-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADVANCED MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Technology Patents LLC v. T-Mobile (UK) Ltd.
as 11-1581
Defendant / Appellee:
TELECOM ITALIA S.P.A., CSL NEW WORLD MOBILITY LIMITED, NETCOM AS and others
Intervenor:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC
DICAM V CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 11-1034
Defendant-Appellee:
AT&T Mobility LLC (f/k/a Cingular Wireless, LLC), Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless), Nextel Operations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Dicam, Inc., Dicam, Inc. and Dicam, Inc.
KYOCERA WIRELESS V ITC
as 08-1355
Appellant:
AT&T Mobility LLC (f/k/a Cingular Wireless, LLC), Kyocera Wireless Corp., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Broadcom Corporation
Appellee:
International Trade Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
