Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Accor Management US Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv04188
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc., Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) LLC, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Visa Inc., MasterCard Incorporated, Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Bruce Davis, et al v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc., et al
as 12-55985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE MAX DAVIS, an individual, BLINDSIDE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership, GLOBAL DATA REVENUE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, a New Jersey Corporation, DBA Verizon Wireless, SPRINT SPECTRUM LP, A Delaware Limited Partnership, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Bruce Max Davis v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02674
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc, AT&T Wireless Services Inc., Cellco Partnership a New Jersey Corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Max Davis, Blindside Entertainment LLC, Global Data Revenue, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hayden v. T-Mobile USA, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01634
Plaintiff:
Katy Hayden
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc, T-Mobile International AG, Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patrick et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv05026
Plaintiff:
Dennis Patrick, Dennis Patrick, James Blackwell and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark et al v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 2:2008cv01485
Plaintiff:
Tonya Clark, Debra Woodbury, Tarquin Black and others
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc., AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
