Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Orlando Communications LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01021
Plaintiff:
Orlando Communications LLC
Defendant:
Pantech Wireless, Inc., Pantech Co., LTD. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Orlando Communications LLC v. HTC Corporation et al
as 6:2014cv01023
Plaintiff:
Orlando Communications LLC
Defendant:
HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2014mi00066
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Omnicomm Corporation v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al
as 13-12361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMNICOMM CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, JONATHAN CHURCH and DANTE MARTIN
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2013cv01648
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2013mi00051
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Valley Telephone Services v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv04129
Plaintiff:
Valley Telephone Services
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and Decatur RSA Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
AT & T Mobility, LLC v. The Phone Card Warehouse, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
AT & T Mobility, LLC
Defendant:
The Phone Card Warehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T Mobility LLC v. John Does 1-14 et al
as 1:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-14 and XYZ Corps. 1-100
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
