Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McKinney v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 8:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Jason L McKinney
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Burns v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 6:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Shawn Burns
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilson v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 6:2022cv02573
Plaintiff:
Tiara Wilson
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bailey v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 6:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Megan Bailey
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pinkowski v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 8:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Gary L Pinkowski
Defendant:
AT&T Southeast Disability Benefits Program and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Emler v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 6:2015cv04554
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Emler
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Noble v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 6:2013cv01123
Plaintiff:
Brian Noble
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brooks v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 3:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
Angela Brooks
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Davidson v. BellSouth Short Term Disability Plan for Non-Salaried Employees
as 7:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Dale Davidson
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
