Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rails International, LLC v. At Last Sportswear, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03133
Plaintiff:
RAILS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Defendant:
AT LAST SPORTSWEAR, INC. d/b/a Beach Lunch Lounge, At Last Sportswear, Inc. doing business as Beach Lunch Lounge and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
AT LAST SPORTSWEAR, INC., v. CHOWDHARY
as 3:2022cv06880
Plaintiff:
AT LAST SPORTSWEAR, INC.,
Defendant:
SUMIT CHOWDHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
AT LAST SPORTSWEAR, INC., v. CHOWDHARY
as 2:2022cv06880
Plaintiff:
AT LAST SPORTSWEAR, INC.,
Defendant:
SUMIT CHOWDHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Rails International, LLC v. At Last Sportswear, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05151
Defendant:
At Last Sportswear, Inc., LESLIE BYRON and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
RAILS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Diane Faber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Ross Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv05836
Defendant:
At Last Sportswear Inc, Does, Kuperhand Inc and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
At Last Sportswear, Inc. v. Kamens
as 1:2013cv02355
Plaintiff:
At Last Sportswear, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Kamens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
