Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Bernert Barge Lines Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bernert Barge Lines Inc, Tugboat Kathryn B, Barge B-16 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC
as 2:2022cv03312
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, Wally's Auction House, LLC, Mel-Jen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of Sparks
as 3:2018cv00583
Defendant:
City of Sparks and Sparks, City of
Plaintiff:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Riverside v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al
as 17-56026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a California charter city and municipal corporation, and as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside
Defendant - Appellant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Neil Schaefer et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 5:2016cv03564
Plaintiff:
Neil Schaefer, Brian Davis, Jill Davis and others
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Compania Panamena de Aviacion, S.A., China Airlines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McKay et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 5:2016cv03561
Plaintiff:
Daniel McKay , Patricia McKay , Babak Sarashki and others
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , City Of San Jose , United Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Riverside et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00796
Plaintiff:
City of Riverside and City of Riverside
Defendant:
Does and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Maxim l Properties
Defendant:
A.M. Bud Krohn, Ultra-Chem International, Inc, Moyer Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
