Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HALL et al v. DELTA AIR LINES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
KARL HALL and MARLENE HALL
Defendant:
DELTA AIR LINES INC and FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVERETT v. UNITED AIR LINES INC
as 1:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
DONALD EVERETT
Defendant:
UNITED AIR LINES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMIN et al v. CONCORD COACH LINES INC
as 2:2010cv00259
Plaintiff:
WASSEM AMIN and BASSEM AMIN
Defendant:
CONCORD COACH LINES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M & J COMMUNICATIONS INC v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
M & J COMMUNICATIONS INC
Defendant:
AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
KRAFT CHEMICAL COMPANY v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
KRAFT CHEMICAL COMPANY
Defendant:
AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
CASCO BAY IMPORTS INC v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
CASCO BAY IMPORTS INC
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON WAY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
BARJAN LLC v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
BARJAN LLC
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON WAY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
