Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Caudle v. AT&T Inc et al
as 5:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, T Mobile AG, Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
D'Anza Johnson
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Swink v. AT&T Inc et al
as 7:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Jaime Swink
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center, The, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wade v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The et al
as 2:2012cv00552
Plaintiff:
Rose D Wade
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The , AT&T Inc and BellSouth Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv02851
Plaintiff:
Robert A Davis , Elton D Davis and Elton Davis Trucking
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Alabama and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barron v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01247
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Eugene Barron
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthews v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthews and Richard Matthews
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc. and Innotrac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Powell v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2009cv01800
Plaintiff:
Kyra Powell, Kyra Powell and Kyra Powell
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
