Cases 41 - 50 of 3,117
Diana Barreto Constante, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3263
Petitioner:
DIANA ISABEL BARRETO CONSTANTE and E. G. R.B.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edwin Orellana Romero v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3247
Petitioner:
EDWIN ESAU ORELLANA ROMERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dione Luiz Da Cunha, et al v. Attorney General United States of AmericaIn re: Dione Luiz Da Cunha, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3244
Petitioner:
DIONE LUIZ DA CUNHA, DANIELE MAIARA RIBEIRO and M. R.C.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Seydou Wane v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3229
Petitioner:
SEYDOU NOUROU WANE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Dorsey, II v. Rebecca Peters, et al
as 23-3216
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY, II
Defendant:
LPN REBECCA PETERS, CASE MANAGER A. FOURA-WHITE, NURSE K. WILLIAMS and others
Mileny Ramirez-Romero, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3217
Petitioner:
MILENY ROSIBETH RAMIREZ-ROMERO and E. S. L.-R.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ali Bazzi v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3205
Petitioner:
ALI RAMEH BAZZI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jathursan Thankarasa v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3204
Petitioner:
JATHURSAN THANKARASA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mercy Coffie-Joseph v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3192
Petitioner:
MERCY COFFIE-JOSEPH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Valdir Rocha da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3187
Petitioner:
VALDIR ROCHA DA SILVA, GEUSIMAR DA SILVA JUSTIMIANO ROCHA and L. R.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
