Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Finney v. Akron City School District Board of Education et al.
as 5:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Vyrone A. Finney
Defendant:
Akron City School District Board of Education, Bruce D. Alexander, N. J. Akbar and others
Interested Party:
Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Autry v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04986
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lana Autry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Autry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Charlotte A. Autry
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Shields v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22565
Plaintiff:
Autry Shields
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Autry et al v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21738
Plaintiff:
Peggy Jean Autry and Jeanie Neville
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk Matthew Schultz v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant:
Jon Namle, Karen Netherton, Julissa Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Matthew Schultz doing business as Whipstocking Idea Co. doing business as No Mow Yard Inc. doing business as Clothes Line Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
AUTRY v. Youthland USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Cheserae D. Autry
Defendant:
Youthland USA, Inc. and R&S Lil Feets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
