Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Nevada Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01509
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Dept of Corrections, NDOC Pharmacy, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eleisa v. Wood et al
as 2:2021cv00734
Respondent:
Natalie Wood and Aaron D. Ford
Petitioner:
Carlos Eleisa and Carlos Manuel Eleisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradford v. Ford et al
as 2:2021cv00688
Defendant:
Sr. Brian Williams, Aaron D. Ford, J Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Motley v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00034
Defendant:
D. Esquivel, State of Nevada, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Motley v. Ford et al
as 3:2020cv00696
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Sharp, Williams Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gioiosa v. Ford et al
as 2:2020cv01415
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Gioiosa, Sr
Defendant:
John Borrowman, Aaron D. Ford, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witter v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00345
Respondent:
Attorney General Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Petitioner:
William Witter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris-Banks v. Daniels et al
as 2:2020cv00997
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Brian E Williams Sr, Theresa Wickham and others
Plaintiff:
Miamor Alisabeth Harris-Banks and M. E. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
