Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Huot v. NOBO Productions Incorporated
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Abby M Huot
Defendant:
NOBO Productions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
BMO Financial Corporation et al v. Cunningham
as 2:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
BMO Financial Corporation and Employee Benefit Program of Bank of Montreal/Harris
Defendant:
Abbie M Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moreno v. Zajicek et al
as 4:2019cv00043
Defendant:
Unknown Nunez, Unknown Lomeli, Guy Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04075
Plaintiff:
Abbie Rowe
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRS GC Corporation v. Oak Tree Management LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02348
Plaintiff:
FRS GC Corporation
Defendant:
Oak Tree Management LLC, Milagro Consulting LLC, David Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRS GC LLC v. Oak Tree Management LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01189
Plaintiff:
FRS GC LLC
Defendant:
Oak Tree Management LLC , Milagro Consulting LLC , David Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01970
Plaintiff:
Abbie Hill and Stephen Nickerson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thirsty Dog Brewing Company v. RA & Abby Incorporated
as 2:2014cv01468
Plaintiff:
Thirsty Dog Brewing Company
Defendant:
RA & Abby Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
