Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ACE European Group, Limited v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., et al
as 14-4073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ACE EUROPEAN GROUP, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
Defendant:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. and HOLLISTER
ACE European Group Limited v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co. et al
as 2:2012cv01214
Plaintiff:
ACE EUROPEAN GROUP, LIMITED
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Company , Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. and Hollister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hill Country Texas Galleria LLC v. Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00308
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hill Country Texas Galleria LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ACE European Group Limited v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co. et al
as 1:2011cv08438
Plaintiff:
ACE European Group Limited
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch, Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. and Hollister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, In v. American Commercial Constructi, et al
as 11-3549
Plaintiff:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CUPPS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Boundas v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
as 1:2010cv04866
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
GS Tiffany Boundas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc v. American Commercial Construction Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc
Defendant:
American Commercial Construction Inc, Richard J Annen, Timothy Cupps and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wright Packaging, Inc. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Wright Packaging, Inc.
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
