Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Neal Caplinger v. CCA, et al
as 14-35190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEAL WAYNE CAPLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIMOTHY WENGLER, THOMAS KESSLER and others
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 13-35887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Moore v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Walter Everett Moore
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Idaho Correctional Center, Acel K. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brink v. CCA Western Properties, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Donald Shane Brink
Defendant:
CCA Western Properties, Inc, David Agler, Brian J McGourty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Richard M Caldwell
Defendant:
IDOC, ICC, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caplinger v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Neal Wayne Caplinger
Defendant:
CCA, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Corrections Corporation of America, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00434
Plaintiff:
Scotty James Bailey
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, LLC, Todd J Mullinger, David W Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gisel v. Agler et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Dan Morris Gisel
Defendant:
David Agler, Acel K Thacker and Idaho Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brecht v. ICC et al
as 1:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Melvin Brecht
Defendant:
ICC , CCA , Acel K Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
