Other Statutes Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 175
The County Commission of Mingo County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff: The County Commission of Mingo County
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
The County Commission of Clay County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00413
Plaintiff: The County Commission of Clay County
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Jefferson County Commission v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP et al
as 3:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: Jefferson County Commission
Defendant: Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP, Purdue Pharma, LP, The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Berkeley County Council v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP et al
as 3:2017cv00143
Plaintiff: Berkeley County Council
Defendant: Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP, Purdue Pharma, LP, The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Beasley v. Actavis Group, HF
as 2:2010cv01205
Plaintiff: Felecia Beasley
Defendant: Actavis Group, HF
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Heckinger v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv01022
Plaintiff: Margaret E. Heckinger
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Stalder v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00959
Plaintiff: Rudolph Stalder
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Garlock v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00948
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Garlock
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Baker v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00876
Plaintiff: Josephine Baker
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Cooley v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00727
Plaintiff: Wilmer Cooley
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?