Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff: BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant: STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Pickens v. Buss
as 24-5008
Petitioner: DARRIN LYNN PICKENS
Respondent: DAVID BUSS, Acting Warden
Ficht v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Defendant: Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution Acting Warden, Daniel Shannon and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Ficht, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdulhaseeb v. Rankins
as 22-6153
Petitioner / Appellant: MADYUN ABDULHASEEB
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM "CHRIS" RANKINS, Acting Warden
Abdulhaseeb v. Rankins
as 22-6152
Petitioner / Appellant: MADYUN ABDULHASEEB
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM CHRIS RANKINS, Acting Warden
Redfearn v. Rankins
as 22-6061
Petitioner / Appellant: JESSE DEAN REDFEARN
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW and CHRIS RANKINS, acting Warden
Thomas v. Skidmore
as 22-3063
Petitioner / Appellant: MATTHEW R. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee: (FNU) SKIDMORE, Acting Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility
Vreeland v. Shannon et al
as 0:2021cv00213
Defendant: Dan Shannon, Scott Abbott, Niecole Molden and others
Plaintiff: Delmart EJM Vreeland, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles v. Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff: Tijay Coles
Defendant: Jennie Ferris, Acting Warden, Terri Smith Chief Judge Wind River Tribal Court Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes in Wyoming, Wind River Indian Reservation, Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Bruscino v. True, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1004
Petitioner - Appellant: RONNIE BRUSCINO
Respondent - Appellee: TRUE, Acting Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?