Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Nash v. A. Bryce, et al
as 24-1263
Plaintiff:
BRENT JAMES NASH
Defendant:
A. BRYCE, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, C. TURNER, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, BECKY CARL, Acting warden, official and personal capacity and others
Rafael Bean v. Nathan Hoffman
as 24-1220
Petitioner:
RAFAEL VERNIER BEAN
Respondent:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden
William Martin, II v. Clark Scott
as 24-3173
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. MARTIN, II
Respondent:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and CLARK SCOTT, Acting Warden, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Derrick Brown, Jr. v. Misty Mackey
as 24-3157
Petitioner:
DERRICK L. BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
David Adams v. Regina Kemp, et al
as 23-2091
Plaintiff:
DAVID OMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
REGINA KEMP, Law Library Clerk, personal capacity, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden, personal capacity, CHESTER DUMS, Assistant Deputy Warden, personal capacity and others
Williams v. Core Civic, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Devon C. Williams
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Acting Warden Misty Mackey, Sgt. fnu Wygant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Russell Fritz v. Misty Mackey
as 23-3974
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL J. FRITZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
Carl Mott v. Paul Schreiber
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL W. MOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL SCHREIBER, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
