Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Carl Mott v. Paul Schreiber
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL W. MOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL SCHREIBER, Acting Warden
Roscoe MartinIn re: Roscoe Martin
as 23-1969
Petitioner:
In re: ROSCOE RICO MARTIN
Respondent:
BARBRA A. STOREY, Acting Warden
Larry Stiff v. Barbra Storey
as 23-1964
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL STIFF
Respondent / Appellee:
BARBRA A. STOREY, Acting Warden
Daniels v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Justice Center, Sheriff Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godspower v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Charles Godspower
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Trinity Food Services, Acting Warden Vincent Vantell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tardy v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tardy
Petitioner:
Daniel A. Horwitz
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee L.L.C., Acting Warden Vincent Vantell, Chance Leeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faiola v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
Michael Faiola, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Justice Center, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Harris v. Willis Chapman
as 23-1806
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY FRANKLIN HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIS CHAPMAN, Acting Warden, Macomb Correctional Facility
Ty-Ron Anderson v. Barbra Storey
as 23-1692
Petitioner / Appellant:
TY-RON STEVEN ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BARBRA STOREY, Acting Warden and BARBRA A. STOREY, Acting Warden
Calvin WareIn re: Calvin Ware
as 23-1651
Petitioner:
In re: CALVIN B. WARE
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden and BARBRA STOREY, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
