Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Phillips v. Jones
as 3:2023cv03875
Petitioner:
Michael Phillips and Michael J. Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Cueva
as 5:2023cv03833
Petitioner:
Donte Marquee Smith
Respondent:
Acting Warden Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Jones
as 5:2023cv02238
Petitioner:
Rember Genaro Molina
Respondent:
Acting Warden Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Christopher Vanning Johnson
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Buren v. Dennison et al
as 5:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
Paul Dennison, Allison MacBeth, S. Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Brown
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, Laura Eldridge, Dr. D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby N. Pope Sr. v. Trent Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jacoby N. Pope, Sr.
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, M Thomas, S. Bangar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arocha v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen and Secretary Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv09053
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield and L. Tobin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar Aguilar v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 2:2022cv08798
Petitioner:
Oscar Aguilar
Respondent:
Acting Warden Tammy L. Campbell and Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
