Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CRUTCHLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchley v. Lowndes County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Crutchley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail and Southern Health Partners Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
as 7:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUTCHLEY v. CLIFTON et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN CLIFTON and SHERIFF ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. ADDISON et al
as 7:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ADDISON, SERGEANT CLARK and SHERIFF RAY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Officer JACKSON and Officer NESMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY et al v. SULLENS et al
as 4:2019cv00215
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY, JIMMY WESLEY PARKER, HEATHER CRUTCHLEY and others
Defendant:
Sergeant HOLLAND and CERT Officer SULLENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUTCHLEY v. HERRON et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Captain THORTON, Counselor BYRD, Deputy Warden of Sec HERRON and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUTCHLEY v. CHAMBERS
as 4:2019cv00043
Defendant:
WARDEN CHAMBERS
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUTCHLEY v. DOES
as 3:2018cv00141
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, Fayette County Jail, Officer Noble and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
