Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Benyoun v. East Chicago IN City of et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marcus C. Benyoun and Marcus C Benyoun
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, IN, Louis Gonzalez, Adam Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Garrett City of et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
DALE K.R. MILLER and Dale K R Miller
Defendant:
CITY OF GARRETT, CHIEF OF POLICE GERALD KLINE, OFFICER ADAM E. SHEFFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barr et al v. St. John, The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Robert Barr and Laura Barr
Defendant:
Town of St. John, Indiana, Town of St. John, Police Department, Steven Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Swick v. LifeLock
as 3:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
LifeLock and Norton Lifelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Google
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. State Farm
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
State Farm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Key Bank
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Key Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Apple
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
