Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Toledo v. Gutierres et al
as 5:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Israel Izazaga Toledo
Defendant:
Federico Gutierres and Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Kentucky State Trooper Post Three, Joshua Ryan Amos, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Polk v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Polk
Defendant:
Adam Jones and William Propes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchell v. McCracken County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burchell
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky , Bill Adams , Ben Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comer et al v. McCracken County Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Ben Comer and David Council
Defendant:
McCracken County Detention Center , Benjamin D. Green , Tonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Grimes et al
as 3:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Alison Lundergan Grimes, Mary Sue Helm, Albert B. Chandler, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adams et al v. Stanton, KY City of et al
as 5:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Blake Adams and New Directions Incorporated, Inc.
Defendant:
Stanton, KY City of and Stanton, City of, Board of Adjustments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardin v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Meade County and others
Plaintiff:
Garr Keith Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
