Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yearwood v. Fisher
as 1:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Adam Yearwood
Defendant:
Sgt Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouse v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Adam Travis Crouse
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Officer Hague and All of Intel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Raney v. Kerr #4835 et al
as 1:2022cv02301
Plaintiff:
Dwight Raney
Defendant:
Det. Kerr #4835, Cpl. Keel #5637 and Det. Adams #5892
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark-El v. Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa et al
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark-El
Defendant:
Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa, Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Christina, Dr. Salin Nhean Nhean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01895
Plaintiff:
Michael Saunders
Defendant:
Warden, Chief Mann, Gov of MD and others
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Adam Scott
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Officer Sparrow and Officer Agonmuno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouse v. Officer Ryan Alba
as 1:2021cv03104
Plaintiff:
Adam Travis Crouse
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Alba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Adams v. B.C.B.I.C.
as 1:2021cv01508
Defendant:
B.C.B.I.C.
Plaintiff:
Roy Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
