Cases 11 - 20 of 133
ADAMS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv12482
Defendant:
MARCUS O HICKS, PATRICK NOGAN, WARREN ZALME and others
Plaintiff:
ALAMEEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2021cv12633
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
LOUIS ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. SERGEANT LIBERTY et al
as 1:2021cv08282
Defendant:
OFFICER REED, OFFICER XAYAPHACHAN, OFFICER TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUSLIM v. STANZIONE et al
as 2:2020cv15669
Defendant:
SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE, MICHAEL HALGELO and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUS MUSLIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. SIMS et al
as 2:2020cv12803
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, SHANTAY ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Plaintiff:
CLINT WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2020cv11523
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
ADAM REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2020cv07237
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, DOREEN STANZIONE, NURSE EVAN and others
Plaintiff:
NASHEED WILLIAMS and THADDEUS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM et al v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2020cv06565
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, DOREEN STANZIONE, MICHAEL ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAL BELTON and RAFIEEK GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
