Cases 1 - 10 of 114
(PC) Young v. Ehlers et al
as 2:2023cv02558
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sanakabisa Young
Defendant:
Ryan Ehlers, Edillberto Rangel, Jose Quezada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adkins v. Schultz et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Defendant:
J. Schultz, D. Richardson, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abad et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Mario Abad, Trevor Adkins, Jarell Brown and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Adkins v. Ditomas et al
as 2:2022cv01650
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Defendant:
Ditomas, D. Cueva, Ms. Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennifer Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams, Michaella Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kati Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04974
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Christina Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05057
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Glen Adkins, Jr. v. Merrick Garland
as 2:2022cv01988
Petitioner:
Glen Adkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lalor v. Schulman et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert Lalor
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
