Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. DGB Audit Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10460
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
DGB Audit Services, LLC and Danette Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Hacker et al. v. ArcelorMittal Tubular Products USA LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hacker and Jinny Hacker
Defendant:
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products USA LLC, Benefits Administration Committee of ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Plan No. 508 and Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chappell et al. v. University Hospitals Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Derek T. Chappell and Linda Chappell
Defendant:
University Hospitals Health Systems, Inc. and University Hospitals Health Systems, Inc. Benefits Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michael Johnson, et al v. Parker Hannifin Corporation, et al
as 24-3014
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. JOHNSON, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, MATTHEW COLLARO, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, JOHN M. BERG and others
Defendant:
PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION, HUMAN RESOURCES AND THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION and others
Bradley Fleming v. Kellogg Company, et al
as 23-1966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY H. FLEMING, Individually, and as Representative of a Class of Participants and Beneficiaries of the Kellogg Company Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLOGG COMPANY, ERISA FINANCE COMMITTEE OF KELLOGG COMPANY, ERISA ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF KELLOGG COMPANY and others
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
as 5:2023cv12354
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Reichert v. Kellogg Company et al
as 2:2023cv12343
Plaintiff:
Thomas N. Reichert
Defendant:
Kellogg Company, Kellogg Company Pension Plan, Kellogg Company - Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Oakland Contracting Co et al
as 2:2023cv11023
Plaintiff:
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Defined Contribution Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Oakland Contracting Co Doing business as Oakland Plumbing Company, Inc Doing business as Oakland Plumbing of Michigan and Michael J. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Dan Allor Plumbing and Heating Company et al
as 2:2023cv11021
Plaintiff:
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Defined Contribution Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Dan Allor Plumbing and Heating Company, Daniel C. Allor, Cindy Sieloff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. SAMA Mechanical Piping, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10658
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
SAMA Mechanical Piping, Inc. and Deandre Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
