Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Harvey Johnson v. Martin, et al
as 18-10836
Plaintiff - Appellant: HARVEY R. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: MARTIN, Unit Manager, JOHN DOE, Administrative Remedy Clerk between 6/28/13 - 7/29/13, JOHN DOE, Administrative Remedy Coordinator between 6/28/13 - 7/29/13 and others
Graham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2015cv00390
Plaintiff: Steven Anthony Graham
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Davila v. Robin Gladden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-10739
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY DAVILA
Defendant - Appellee: ROBIN GLADDEN, National Inmate Appeals Coordinator, R. E. HOLT, Regional Administrative Remedies Coordinator, WARDEN, in their individual and official capacities and others
Davilla v. Anthony Haynes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00005
Defendant: National Inmate Appeals Coordinator , Regional Administrative Remedies Coordinator , Anthony Haynes and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Gorbey v. FBOP Regional Director, et al
as 11-11688
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee: HARRELL WATTS, FBOP Regional Director, REBERTA TRUMAN, FBOP Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Washington D.C., UNKNOWN NAMES FBOP ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, Washington D.C. and others
Gorbey v. Watts et al
as 5:2011cv00022
Plaintiff: Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant: Harrell Watts, Reberta Truman, Unknown Named FBOP Administrative Remedy Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carswell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Administrative Remedy Coordinator
as 5:2008cv00395
Plaintiff: Robert Carswell
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons Administrative Remedy Coordinator
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?