Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Armour Jolley v. Unknown Named BOP Directors, et al
as 24-5111
Plaintiff: Armour Lyle Jolley
Defendant: Unknown Named BOP Directors, FBOP Director from 2017 to present, Individually and in official capacity, Unknowned Named BOP Employees, FBOP Gang Unit on August 5, 2020 Classification Officer, Individually and in official capacity, Antonelli, Warden, individually and in official capacity and others
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01285
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01101
Plaintiff: STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM BECHTOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. Cranston Mitchell, et al
as 11-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant: Darrell James Parks
Defendant - Appellee: Cranston J. Mitchell, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of United States Parole Commission and others
GARMON v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: DAVID G. GARMON
Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, JOSEPH NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalka, Ben v. Hawk, Kathleen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 98-5485
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ben Kalka
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Ed Crosley, Administrative Remedy Coordinator and John Does, 1-20, Bureau of Prisons Staff
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant: William M. Hohengarten

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?