Cases 31 - 40 of 202
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3282
Petitioner:
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Onysko v. Stewart, et al
as 21-9529
Respondent:
AL STEWART, Acting Secretary of Labor and ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
STEVEN ONYSKO
Estate of Daniel A. Ayres v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3017
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF DANIEL A. AYRES, by Kimberly Ayres, Administrator
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 20-4342
Petitioner:
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Seneca Re-Ad Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Department of Labor et al
as 3:2020cv02325
Defendant:
Eugene Scalia, Administrative Review Board and Secretary of the Department of Labor
Plaintiff:
Seneca Re-Ad Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Bernadine Poulter v. USDOL, et al
as 20-72978
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
BERNADINE POULTER
Adriano Budri v. Administrative Review Board
as 20-60574
Petitioner:
ADRIANO BUDRI
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
James Wright, Jr. v. Kimberly Butler, et al
as 20-1926
Defendant / Appellee:
MINH T. SCOTT, Chairman of the Adjustment Committee, REBECCA COWAN, Member of the Adjustment Committee, KIMBERLY BUTLER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. WRIGHT, JR.
Jeff Yowell v. Administrative Review Board
as 20-60274
Petitioner:
JEFF YOWELL
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BNSF Railway Company v. Administrative Review Board, et al
as 20-70655
Petitioner:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Not Yet Classified:
STEVE BROUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
