Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Jeude v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Adrian Barnes, Doctor Unknown Mallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. St. Louis Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Sheriffs Dept., Col. John W. Hayden, Jr., Governor Michael L. Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Kia Motors America, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00296
Defendant:
Takata Corp., Kia Motors America, Inc., Hyundai Motor Company and others
Plaintiff:
Cherie Russell, Victor Brown, Adriane Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Geico Casualty Company v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company
Defendant:
Adrian Smith, Kacie Brooks, Donna Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Minnis v. USA
as 4:2022cv00263
Petitioner:
Antonio Adrian Minnis, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kinder v. Clark et al
as 5:2022cv06006
Plaintiff:
Adrian Douglas Lee Kinder
Defendant:
Cook Unknown Clark, Cook Unknown Morton, Cook Unknown Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinder v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv01502
Plaintiff:
Adrian Douglas Lee Kinder
Defendant:
Cook Unknown Clark, Cook Unknown Morton, Cook Unknown Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. USA
as 4:2021cv00979
Petitioner:
Adrian Lemons
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shaw v. Adams
as 4:2021cv00707
Petitioner:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ausler v. Glass et al
as 4:2021cv00644
Defendant:
George Hayes, Correctional Officer Boatman, Lieutenant Javan Fowlkes and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ausler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
