Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02007
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00327
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Konecny v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01842
Defendant:
Vaafusuaga, Amsberry, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Ehren Konecny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konecny v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01385
Defendant:
"Jane Doe", Collette Peters, "John Brown" and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Ehren Konecny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Defendant:
Christopher Barton, Clackamas County, Timothy Conger and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montoya-Franco v. Bowser
as 2:2017cv01593
Respondent:
T. Bowser
Petitioner:
Adrian Montoya-Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Killingbeck v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01454
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Darren Adrian Killingbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Hascall et al
as 2:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Kim Brockamp, City of Pendleton, County of Umatilla, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
