Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maclachlan et al v. 3M et al
as 1:2014cv10001
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., General Refractories Company, (1 - 100) John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Pat Maclachlan
Cross Claimant:
Oakfabco, Inc. and George V. Hamilton, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Donald Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Asbestos Action-Refiled as 1:14-cv-10001
as 1:2014cv02326
Plaintiff:
Donald Maclachlan and Pat Maclachlan
Defendant:
3M, AO Smith Corporation, Advance Stores Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Advance Stores Company, Inc. et al v. Corview, Inc. et al
as 1:2000cv02764
Counter Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Advance Stores Company Incorporated Employee Benefit Plan
Counter Claimant:
Corview, Inc. and Masters Agency, Inc. formerly doing business as Eagle Administrators Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
The Masters Agency, Inc. and Physicians Medical Review Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Dan Aaron Polster
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
