Cases 1 - 10 of 265
Ward v. Nesibo et al
as 3:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Ward
Defendant:
Adil Ahmed Nesibo and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Suarez v. Step Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Roberto Suarez
Defendant:
Step Trucking, Inc. and Saeed-Al-Gahmi Saeed Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Guled H, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bocanegra Smith
Defendant:
Guled H, LLC and Ahmed Addi Ismaaiil
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00979
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
