Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Hage (Salim)
as 23-6185
Defendant:
WADIH EL-HAGE, FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM, Abu Hajer al Iraqi and Abu Hajer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz v. A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv07361
Plaintiff:
Felix Diaz
Defendant:
Utz Quality Foods, Inc., Utz Quality Foods, LLC, A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
1902 New Way Gourmet Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2022cv04721
Plaintiff:
1902 New Way Gourmet Inc. and Rashad Luft Ahmed Mohammed
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
El Gammal v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv03589
Petitioner:
Ahmed Mohammed El Gammal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
