Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00326
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Southern Utah Wilderness, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-4073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and AHMED MOHSEN, in his official capacity as Color Country District Manager
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH and GARFIELD COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02095
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, US Department of the Interior and Ahmed Mohsen
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Society, The, National Parks Conservation Association and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
EnerVest et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2016cv01256
Defendant:
Jewell, Bureau of Land Management, Sally Jewell and others
Plaintiff:
EnerVest, EnerVest Operating and EnerVest Institutional GP
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0181
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance , Natural Resources Defense Council and Wilderness Society, The
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and Ahmed Mohsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
