Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Blackwood-Pena v. Air Canada
as 1:2023cv05870
Plaintiff:
Suzette Blackwood-Pena
Defendant:
Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ros v. Air Canada
as 1:2021cv00357
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trid et al v. Air Canada
as 1:2019cv06276
Plaintiff:
Olena Guz, Vladen Faynerman and Iryna Trid
Defendant:
Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. d/b/a Primeflight of DE, Primeflight Aviation Service, Inc. and Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harricharan v. Air Canada
as 1:2014cv06889
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Anna Harricharan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. v. Air Canada et al
as 1:2013cv06399
Defendant:
AC Cargo LP and Air Canada
Plaintiff:
DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Delta Airlines Inc et al v. Visa Inc et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Air Canada, Air New Zealand Limited, Alticor Inc and others
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Futersak v. Air Canada
as 1:2010cv01682
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Sam Futersak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Air Canada et al
as 1:2009cv04217
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Williams
Defendant:
Air Canada and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MacDonald v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
Susan MacDonald
Defendant:
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Aerolineas Brasileiras S.A., Air Canada and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
