Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Douglass v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Richard Douglass
Defendant:
Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc., Aircraft Service International, Inc., Air Menzies International (USA) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151 Railway Labor Act (Definitions)
Danny Lopez v. Aircraft Service International, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07108
Plaintiff:
Danny Lopez
Defendant:
Aircraft Service International, Inc., Air Menzies International (USA), Inc., Menzies Aviation (USA), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Aircraft Service International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03213
Plaintiff:
Dion Martin
Defendant:
Aircraft Service International, Inc. and Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Carrillo v. Aircraft Service International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02208
Plaintiff:
Eufrocino Pablo Carrillo
Defendant:
Aircraft Service International, Inc. and Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canlas et al v. Aircraft Service International, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02355
Defendant:
Aircraft Service International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jezen Canlas and George Sto Domingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
