Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Shelby County Alabama et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv00609
Defendant:
INV Performance Surfaces LLC, 3M Company, Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby County Alabama and Talladega County Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Dorsett Industries, Inc., Tandus Centiva, Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Johnson
Special Master:
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Petitioner:
The Carpet and Rug Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation v. Brumlow Mills, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Brumlow Mills, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
The Water Works and Sewer Boar v. Aladdin Manufacturing Corp., et al
as 17-15459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF THE TOWN OF CENTRE
Defendant - Appellant:
ALADDIN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. and MOHAWK CARPET LLC
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
:
SERVICE
The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre
Defendant:
3M Company , Shaw Industries Inc , Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins & Aikman Floor Coverings, Inc. et al v. Interface, Inc.
as 4:2005cv00133
Special Master:
Carlos A Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Collins & Aikman Floor Coverings, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc., Mohawk Brands, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Interface, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation, Mohawk Carpet Corporation and Mohawk Commercial, Inc.
Respondent:
David Oakey and Kilpatrick Stockton LLP.
Petitioner:
Sydney Daniel and David Oakley Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
