Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Danny Marshall
Defendant:
Alameda Contra Costa Transit District, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Robert L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Raynor v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
as 3:2023cv04297
Plaintiff:
Samuel Raynor
Defendant:
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darion Edwards v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit, et al
as 20-16173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARION EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
SALVADOR LLAMAS and ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, a California public transit authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Darion Edwards v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit, et al
as 19-15077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARION EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
SALVADOR LLAMAS and ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, a California public transit authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv05778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv02916
Respondent:
AG Neovo Technology Corp, Health Benefits Plan, AG Neovo Technology Corp., AT&T Medical Plan and others
Petitioner:
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P.
Unknown:
Gwendolyn L. Fanger and Paul Tweedie Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
