Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alberic Israel v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11518
Petitioner:
ALBERIC ISRAEL
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alberic Israel v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-14291
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ALBERIC ISRAEL
Alberic Israel v. Department of Children and Fam, et al
as 17-10427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERIC ISRAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, KAVAJA SARDUY, Case Manager, Department of Children and Families and MIKE CARROLL, Head Executive, Department of Children and Families
Alberic Israel v. City of North Miami, et al
as 17-10040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERIC ISRAEL, on behalf of A.I. and E.I., minor children
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, CHIEF OF POLICE, NORTH MIAMI BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Clint Shannon, JOSEPH KISSEL, North Miami Police Department and others
In re: Alberic Israel
as 16-17215
Petitioner:
In re: ALBERIC ISRAEL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Israel v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2016cv24375
Plaintiff:
Alberic Israel
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Kavaja Sarduy and Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel v. City of North Miami et al
as 1:2016cv24105
Plaintiff:
Alberic Israel
Defendant:
City of North Miami, Chief of Police, North Miami Police Department, Joseph Kissel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv23566
Plaintiff:
Alberic Israel
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Alberic Israel
as 13-14317
Petitioner:
In re: ALBERIC ISRAEL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Israel et al v. City of North Miami et al
as 1:2012cv23581
Plaintiff:
Alberic Israel and Sheila Mesadieu
Defendant:
City of North Miami, Chief of Police, Joseph Kissel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
