Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MITCHELL v. PAROLE BOARD OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2016cv00194
Plaintiff: WILLIAM G MITCHELL
Defendant: PAROLE BOARD OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLAW v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff: CALVIN OUTLAW
Defendant: BRIAN OWENS, TERRY E BARNARD, ALBERT MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Bearden v. State of Georgia, et al
as 16-11931
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY BEARDEN
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, STATE OF GEORGIA, ALBERT MURRAY, Chairman and others
Bearden v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02254
Petitioner: Rodney Bearden
Respondent: State of Georgia, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, Albert Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerard Pugh v. Albert Murray, et al
as 14-12063
Petitioner - Appellant: GERARD J. PUGH
Respondent - Appellee: ALBERT MURRAY, State Pardon and Paroles, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and PENNY FREESEMANN, Chatham County Superior Court
MALVERTY v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2014cv00117
Petitioner: BRIAN P MALVERTY
Respondent: ANTOINE CALDWELL, JOHN MAYES and ALBERT MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PUGH v. MURRAY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00091
Petitioner: GERARD PUGH
Respondent: ALBERT MURRAY, SAM OLSEN and PENNY FREESEMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris Ricks v. Albert Murray
as 13-14237
Petitioner - Appellant: RICK MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee: ALBERT MURRAY
Harrison v. Henderson et al
as 1:2013cv02952
Plaintiff: Bobby Harrison
Defendant: Thurmone Henderson, Albert Murray, Terry Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fedd v. Owens et al
as 1:2013cv01120
Plaintiff: Frank Solomon Fedd
Defendant: Brian Owens, Sharon Lewis, Vicki Barron and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?