Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luna v. Gonzales
as 9:2010cv01111
Petitioner:
Worklis Luna
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Amicu:
Gelernt Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leslie v. Mule
as 10-2115
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nicholas Leslie
Respondent - Appellee:
Charles Mule, Facilities Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, William Cleary, District Director, DRO Field Office and Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Rodriguez v. Gonzales
as 1:2008cv04009
Petitioner:
Victor M. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Canterbury v. Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2007cv11536
Petitioner:
Hoaney Canterbury
Respondent:
Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Sirleaf v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv01124
Petitioner:
Abraham Sirleaf
Respondent:
Major Smith, Peter J. Smith and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKay v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv01081
Petitioner:
Dennis G. McKay, Jr.
Respondent:
Major Smith, Peter J. Smith and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arthur v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv06473
Plaintiff:
Alberto Arthur
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
