Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Boggon et al v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00952
Plaintiff:
Titus Boggon and Jennifer Lee
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kuznetsova v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00787
Plaintiff:
Inna Kuznetsova
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Russo v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00698
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Russo
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Khawatmi v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv00695
Plaintiff:
Majed Khawatmi
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Masaud v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Masaud
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Robert Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Shijin et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv00596
Plaintiff:
Wang Shijin and Weidong Zhou
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, United States Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Alkeylani et al vs Dept of Homeland, et al
as 3:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
Abd Alkeylani, Yasmeen Joonas Keylani and Judy Keylani
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Abis v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00496
Plaintiff:
Driss Abis
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
