Cases 21 - 30 of 156
Myftari v. Mukasey
as 07-3940
Petitioner:
ANJEZA MYFTARI, SOKOL MYFTARI and BESA MYFTARI
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Haji v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02165
Plaintiff:
Abdul Qadir Haji and Abdul Qadir Haji
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lin v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00555
Petitioner:
Hai Lin
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Yu v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00228
Plaintiff:
Keshun Yu
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kopyonkina, et al. v. Mukasey
as 07-3894
Petitioner:
NATALYA VLADIMIROVNA KOPYONKINA and KAROLINA NIKOLAYEVNA KOPYONKINA
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Zhao v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv12868
Plaintiff:
Yunbo Zhao
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Nepoomnyashchiy v. Gonzales
as 3:2007cv00358
Petitioner:
Mikhail Nepoomnyashchiy
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Aburto-Rocha v. Mukasey
as 07-3871
Petitioner:
SERVANDO ABURTO-ROCHA
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Lamaj v. Mukasey
as 07-3873
Petitioner:
NOVRUS LAMAJ, LILJANA LAMAJ and NALTON LAMAJ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Zhu v. Mukasey
as 07-3869
Petitioner:
YONG-ZHANG ZHU, aka Jeffrey Dong
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
