Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Ndoci v. Holder
as 07-3979
Petitioner:
VALENTIN NDOCI
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Rusishvili v. Mukasey
as 07-3959
Petitioner:
AVTANDIL RUSISHVILI
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2007cv01137
Plaintiff:
Betsy L. Brooks, Betsy L. Brooks and Betsy L. Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, David Kustoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sinha v. Upchurch et al
as 1:2007cv02274
Plaintiff:
Ajay Kumar Sinha
Defendant:
Evelyn Upchurch, Mark Hansen, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yancy v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01134
Plaintiff:
Daphene Yancy
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. Holder
as 07-3948
Petitioner:
ROSA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Myftari v. Mukasey
as 07-3940
Petitioner:
ANJEZA MYFTARI, SOKOL MYFTARI and BESA MYFTARI
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sanders v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01133
Plaintiff:
Robert Sanders
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Alberto Gonzales and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
