Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Rizwan v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03394
Plaintiff:
Malik Rizwan
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Andrea Quarantillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ahmed v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03396
Plaintiff:
Ijaz Ahmed
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Andrea Quarantillo
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bonawandt et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03392
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Bonawandt and Bertila Bedaque DeLima
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Andrea Quarantillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03393
Plaintiff:
Sujan Singh
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Andrea Quarantillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv07232
Petitioner:
Song Chen
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Lee v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv03342
Plaintiff:
Hwang Yong Lee
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Donovan v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv07126
Plaintiff:
William Donovan
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, State of NY + NJ, Fox News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv07157
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Hernandez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Singh v. Mule et al
as 6:2007cv06387
Petitioner:
Balminder Singh
Respondent:
Charles Mule, William Cleary and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
