Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Luevano v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
John Doe, Eric Ben, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valliere v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00829
Petitioner:
Demond S. Valliere
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valliere v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv00505
Petitioner:
Demond S. Valliere
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Xiao v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007mc00607
Plaintiff:
Jing Xiao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Sharon A. Hudson, Alberto Gonzales and others
Soe v. Gonzales
as 6:2007cv00333
Petitioner:
Thant Zin Soe
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bokhetache v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv00476
Petitioner:
Mohamed Bokhetache
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bokhetache v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00744
Petitioner:
Mohamed Bokhetache
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00692
Petitioner:
Ruben Flores
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kuon v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00691
Petitioner:
Billy Kuon
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, United States of America and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Deng v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00175
Petitioner:
Garang Garang Deng
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, John Sourkaris, Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
