Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THE F.A. BARTLETT TREE EXPERT COMPANY v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv01303
Plaintiff:
THE F.A. BARTLETT TREE EXPERT COMPANY
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ALI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01176
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED A. ALI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, ANDREA QUARANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
ZHANG v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv00562
Plaintiff:
SUYING ZHANG
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
STIRLING v. GONZALES et al
as 3:2007cv00294
Plaintiff:
DAVID IAN STIRLING
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
