Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hussain v. Muller et al
as 4:2007cv02755
Plaintiff:
Altaf Hussain
Defendant:
Robert S Muller, Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Holder v. Alberto R Gonzales
as 4:2007cv02219
Plaintiff:
Rogelio E Holder
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hammoud v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007mc00359
Petitioner:
Hussein Hammoud
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales and others
Hammoud v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv01972
Plaintiff:
Hussein Hammoud
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Syngaevsky v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv01664
Plaintiff:
Pavel Syngaevsky
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv01585
Plaintiff:
Rana Ahmer Latif Khan
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vazir vs Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv01575
Plaintiff:
Moshin Vazir
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Contreras-Castro v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007mc00237
Plaintiff:
Roberto Contreras-Castro
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
